Friday, July 13, 2018


Sylvester Zottola and Vinnie Basciano
You may have heard about this.  I believe it took place Wednesday morning at around 6:30 a.m. in the Bronx, New York.  Alleged Bonanno associate Salvatore Zotolla was shot numerous times outside of his home while walking to his minivan parked outside of his house.

In the surveillance video which was released this morning shows a red Nissan pull up alongside Sal and a gunmen opens up.  Zottola rolls around to the back of the minivan to block himself from the incoming bullets and the gun men runs around to the right side of the van, and Zottola begins to roll to his left and the gunmen unloads more rounds before running back to the car and taking off.

Zottola was shot three times.  Once in the hand, once in the chest, and one shot grazed off his head.  He's lucky to be alive.  According to law enforcement Zottola has completely refused to cooperate with investigators.  He has refused to give the FBI any statements, refused to speak at all about the incident and has also refused to let any law enforcement look at the additional camera footage of the event.  The footage released this morning is actually from a nearby Yacht club.

It's widely believed via law enforcement that Zottola does in fact know who the gunmen is. Police are looking into if an earlier attempted hit this month on Sal's father Sylvester Zottola, 71, is in connection.  On June 12, Sylvester was leaving his home, a gunmen approached him with gun in hand and Zottola opened fire.  He was arrested and charged with three felony counts and a misdemeanor. He was charged with having a loaded firearm, criminal possession of a firearm and a secondary having a loaded firearm charge. According to law enforcement Sylvester is also affiliated with  the Bonanno crime family.This is the second time in a few years someone attempted to kill Sylvester Zotolla.  Back in December of 2017, he was stabbed in his neck in his own home. According to reports Zotolla walked into his home to find intruders.

According to law enforcement both Zotolla's are associated with the Bonanno crime family through Vinnie Basciano, who allegedly at one time was the acting boss of the Bonanno crime family. According to law enforcement Basciano had business with Sylvester Zotolla via joker poker machines, however in 2006 Basciano would be charged with racketeering conspiracy in connection with the machines.  He would also be charged with assaulting Frank Poco, who allegedly was fucking with Sylvester Zottola's business. For the record, Salvatore does not have a criminal record whatsoever and there are also no public photos of him.

It remains to be if the three incidents are related, but from the street perspective, I don't believe this to be the case.  It's either one of two different scenarios, which I'm not going to discuss in depth publicly because it would just be an assertion on my behalf, but let's just say this.  It was definitely amateur hour on the streets the other day.

 Just looking at the video myself, it's apparent the shooter has never likely shot a gun in his life, or at least never attempted to shoot anyone before.  It the glory days, guys who went on hits, were patient, and didn't do thuggish type of drive-bys.    You certainly make sure you hit someone on the first shot, to avoid precious time.  If you had to get out of the car, you get the job done.  I am not poking fun of this event, or anything else.  I'm simply saying the video lends credence to the idea that I don't think this was ordered by anyone.  This looks more like a beef over something that culminated over something stupid.  Either that or the mob is employing young guys who wanna make a name for themselves.   We haven't seen a hit or attempted hit like this since 2013 in New York City.  For the life of me, I can guarantee one thing however.  Whomever the shooter is, he had better pack up and leave for his own safety because if this was ordered you can bet botching it sealed his own fate.  I also scoff at the idea that they didn't seem to notice security cameras.  It also lends itself to not being planned and looks more of a gut check, or a not designed shooting. It had all the looks of a mob hit, designed by amateurs.   Thankfully Sal is alive and on the mend.  You can be sure however, that with nobody talking, that it will likely end another way, that's only if the cops didn't get the plates.  Don't these kids watch the first 48?  Sheesh.

Thursday, June 21, 2018


So to be perfectly clear, I loved the movie GOTTI.  I cannot say enough things about the GOTTI film.  However there is a backlash, but one that's been intentionally derived from a lot of places.  The point of contention here is that 0% rating from Rotten Tomates, which to be honest has had a history of intentionally and dubiously fixing it so films get dogged.  While I cannot 100% prove that, I can give you some specifics.  It's not just Rotten Tomatoes.  It's a lot of outlets.

To begin with, we have to understand two things.  First, GOTTI was filmed for $10,000,000.  Secondly it only opened to 500 theaters.  That's important to know because already GOTTI is set to make a profit.  Just basing that on more theaters and what they are going to pull in from overseas and other platforms like Netflix, and Amazon, if the film is heading that direction.

For any film to be a success you want two things.  You want great reviews and a proft financially.  The film has both, but the media doesn't want you to see that.  The first instance I knew that this film was going to take backstabbing was when some "critics," who didn't actually see the film in Cannes, blasted it.  Not only were no critics actually at the film, but early reports began articles by blasting John Gotti Jr for being in attendance.  When you begin an article saying loosely that someone of John Gotti's "ill repute," shouldn't be allowed at a film festival which is considered to be a high society affair, you sorta know right then, it's a personal issue and not an artistic evaluation.  Secondly these people had no issue with Harvey Weinstein attending these events over the years, and I'm sorry but in comparison to allegations about John Gotti Jr, he's a saint.

Then came Rotten Tomatoes.  First of all, the top portion of the website is for "credible critics."  I find that phrase to be hilarious and entertaining because every single critic bashed the film.  They don't showcase audience scores on the main page.  In fact, the audience is who counts because they actually pay to see the film and not piggy back off of other critics.  So when you click on the secondary page you can see the audience rating which was over 80% a few days ago.  To contrast, those numbers are as high as those who saw the Incredibles 2.  I can also verify that good reviews were taken down intentionally.  I know so because I left a review which was positive, as did a host of other people who contacted me and said for some reason their review was taken down and a bad review was put in it's place.  This isn't delusion, but facts.

Gotti on Rotten Tomatoes has an insane and "suspiciously" high number of user ratings.  Try 7,000 which is higher than OCEANS 8, and on par with INCREDIBLES 2.  Both those films opened to 2,000 plus theaters.  Gotti was released to 25 cities and on 500 screens.  

The accuracy at which Rotten Tomatoes is thrusting it's reviews is highly suspect.  This isn't the first time this has happened with the site either.  When The Last Jedi came out, the same sort of shenanigans happened.  Rotten Tomatoes has denied any culpability and has said on record "nothing is out of place."

GOTTI made $1,719,902 it's opening weekend on 503 screens.  As of now the film per box office mojo has made $2,131,991.  If we simply do the math here, it's averaging $3,419 per screen.  Keep in mind 503 screens.  If this film opened up at 1,500 screens which isn't even half of what other big films have opened to, the film would have pulled in $5,128,500 opening weekend.  Half way to a profit, so the idea here is, the film will be a success financially.   I don't think under any circumstances this film won't be a financial success.  We also aren't including other cities and countries who have not seen the film yet.   But what about the critics?

To be honest, from day one they have been against this movie.  There are a lot of reasons.  Some of the very outlets that covered the film early on like Entertainment Weekly, who were prone to say very complimentary things about this film for months, have joined the bandwagon and now officially trashed it.  Everyone has a right to an opinion, but in this day and age of fake news, and people simply just piggy backing off one another, how can we take anything they say seriously?

A film is art, like it or not.  This isn't about a political narrative as much as the media seems to be making it.  What ever happened to going to see a film, and allowing yourself to take it all in and like it or dislike it?  I have to also question Lionsgate here.  Lionsgate sold back the rights to the film ten days before it's release(which isn't accurate, but that's what the media has been telling you.)  That tells me more about this "unfounded conspiracy," that the media keeps bloating about.

The film was bought back, way prior to ten days, but the media being savvy at distortion isn't telling you that.  They wanted to make headlines and drama, and that's what they did.  I wonder why and the timing of it all.  At first I asked my radio audience a question.  Why not come out sooner?  I was under the belief that the people behind the film just kept making crucial mistakes.  Not true.  The film was bought back way before the announcement, and frankly there wasn't a reason to come right out with it, but Lionsgate in my opinion set that in motion.  All that did was create the illusion that this film was a failure and they sold it back because of it.  That's how it was portrayed in the media.  The truth is, Lionsgate wanted a very very small release, and the media has also spun it in the negative by saying likely is was because Lionsgate knew they had a bad film.  Not true.  The media has also spun the idea that the producers didn't want critics at Cannes because it was a bad film.  Not true.  Are you seeing a trend here? GOTTI was wanted to be seen on a bigger scale, and that's why the film was bought back.  That's the truth.  How this got distorted like that is beyond me.

We can argue all day about finances and creative arts, but the truth is, this film from day one, for whatever conspiracy you choose to believe in, was pegged as a pos.  Just simple websites are crammed with bot reviews, fake profiles, and in the age where we have seen Russian infiltration of votes, and scams designed at morphing the news you actually receive, this is the same shit on a smaller scale.  Someone is behind it, and you have to ask yourself why.

I cannot put my hand on one culprit here.  I also wish I could tell you the film is just bad, and it's that simple.  The film wasn't bad, it was fantastic.  The reviews from those who actually spent money to go see it have said it's good.  In fact, to take this one step further.  I have messages from over 2,000 of my listeners.  Of those 2,000 who saw the film, only 4 didn't like it.  That should tell you something.  Many of those 2,000 viewers also went on Rotten Tomatoes to leave a review, and did.  Those reviews were taken down auspiciously by someone and replaced with bad ones.  It's the honest truth.  Rotten Tomatoes can deny that, but people were smart and took screen shots.  The average person who went and saw this film are not being represented here.  The critics are however and it's repulsive.

To push it one smidgen further, I noticed on my review of the film I had twice the dislikes I have had on any of my radio shows.  Usually the Alite fan group(all 13) are the ones who dislike my stuff.  Fine, I accept that.  But in 5,378 views on Youtube, I have 97 likes and 47 dislikes.  It's a high number.  I have never had 47 dislikes ever.  Take my Roy DeMeo show which is over 24,900 views.  187 likes, 44 dislikes.  It has four times the views as the GOTTI film review, let lower dislikes.  To push this one step further, let's do some math.  On the GOTTI review, I have one dislike for every 895 views.  On the DeMeo show, only one dislike every 2,400 listens.  While it may be confusing, let me explain.

What I do is very simple.  People like me or hate me.  They either enjoy what I do or hate it.  In my shows I do the histories and timelines of gangsters.  Usually I'm well received with some dislikes.  Over time as the numbers grow obviously your dislikes will grow.  However in just six days I eclipsed my highest number of dislikes simply because I reviewed the film.  What outsiders don't know, is I can jump into the analytics of it all and see where these are coming from.  My fan base is mainly New York(Queens and Long Island) Miami, and Boston.  The big cities.  However with the negative aspects of the GOTTI film, guess where my dislikes are coming from?  Los Angeles, Iran, India, Istanbul, and Iraq.  While that's amusing in many senses, I did some further digging.

Turns out, these Youtube channels or members are NOT from any of those countries.  The emails all come back to the United States.  They may locate themselves in a country but the reality is, they are bots.  They aren't  actively watching my show.  Transversely while looking at my other shows, I followed those dislikes and all came back to normal places, and those emails actually worked. They are designed by social media to click yes or no.  To make matters worse, when I attempted to email associated accounts with negative dislikes I got those "your email cannot be sent, web address doesn't exist."  In other words those accounts have been closed.  Also on these pages of reviewers, they don't have any photos, zero friends, and aren't subscribed to anything.  These accounts were only registered within the last two weeks, and then closed seemingly after they smacked the dislike on my page.  Conspiracy?  Absolutely.


In final, believe what you want.  Like the film, hate the film, it doesn't matter to me.  I have no dog in the race.  However when I see some corrupt shit going on, as a result of lies and intentionally trying to ruin something I have a tendency to get a little pissed.  You don't have to like the GOTTI'S to like this film.  You don't have to agree with John Gotti's lifestyle.  This is art imitating life, and why people cannot digest that is beyond me.  The truth is, the tree was poisoned intentionally and it further proves to me that Hollywood plays favorites, and if they don't want you to succeed they will go to extreme lengths to shut you down.

Friday, June 15, 2018


I'm going to be honest, I was on the fence about the GOTTI film from day one.  It wasn't the delays, that happens when your attempting to make a film.  It wasn't the subject material.  For me the big questions were, will they leave stuff out?  Will they make a film that bends reality?  Will they get reasonable actors?

I was honestly afraid to go near this film.  In fact, many don't know this, but I kept refusing to even discuss whether I could go see it.  It wasn't because I didn't want to see a film about John Gotti, rather it was, I was totally afraid to see it and not like it.  I didn't want to be honest if I didn't like it.  Not that I would be scorned if I didn't, but I'm a mob snob.

When I say mob snob, I mean I like my gangster films a certain way.  I like the gore, I like the revenge, and when I heard that this film would be very family oriented in the respect that you would see specific moments from the families perspective, I got a little worried.

When the first photos of John Travolta came out, I was stunned. He looked like John Gotti, but could he really portray him closer to the reality then Armand Assante?  When I saw the first few scenes, I was on the fence.  Scene pops as I call them, don't do this film any justice.

I sat down, with my friend, who'd already seen it.  He knows me very well, and he kept saying how much I would like it.  I never doubted him, but as I said I'm a mob weirdo, so therefore I can be very very picky about these types of films.  Not only was he on the mark, but sitting here now at 3 a.m. I'm still excited, still happy, and still blown away.

In the film GOTTI, your not getting one dish.  In the tradition of Italian meals, you're getting several dishes and they are all ON FIRE!! From the beginning to the end, there is not a single second where I felt bored, confused, or let down.  The film moves quick, makes central points, and pushes on to other moments.

To see Kelly Preston completely lose it as her beloved son Frankie is killed in a horrific accident was guttural to endure.  To see Travolta cradle his wife in that moment was tender, and absolutely gut wrenching.  To witness what Peter went through as his father was dying in a prison hospital was excruciating to witness. 

This is a complete film in every sense.  You aren't just getting the bells and whistles, but your getting an emotional arc I was not expecting. Kevin Connolly is truly a master at his craft.  One might not suspect that the casting choices made in this film far exceeded any expectations I could ever hope to imagine.  I wondered if Kevin could bring me a dish I would want to eat over and over again, and he not only has succeeded as a director, but he has proven that the traditional mob formula that has worked so well in the past for other films, is almost now pas-say.   

In all of the gangster or mob genre films I have ever seen, this one is by far, the best I have ever seen. What made this so different was the character arcs, the emotion, and the brutal honesty.  They held nothing back from beginning to end.  They should be insanely proud of the work of art that is GOTTI.

I'm almost sitting her scratching my head at how some of the people who came out after Cannes saying this was bad, awful, out of sync it was.  I don't know what movie they saw, but I'm telling you that's not the movie I saw.  Too many films rely on a gangster being just that.  A one dimensional thug hell bent on rage, greed, and murder.  In this film, you get the John Gotti you never knew.  The man, the myth, the legend.  Not just a street guy, but a father, a friend, and a boss.

In final, the only grievance I could state that I had, was that there wasn't more.

Thursday, June 14, 2018


This is an article I wasn't going to write.  Not that I don't have anything to say, but so many facts get distorted over time, and so many stories get changed via the public narration that many people have John Gotti all wrong.

I'm not saying he was a saint.  Rather the opposite.  He was a sinner, knew it, accepted it and owned it like nobody else.  He didn't pretend to be anybody but himself.  He was witty, kind, and very very dangerous to those who tested his values and patience.  He was as complex as they come.  There will be those that tell you anecdotes of how kind, how caring, how funny he was.  Then there will be those who saw a completely different version of the man, one who could "stare right fucking through you as if you didn't exist, causing your bowels to make noises you never heard before."

John Gotti was La Cosa Nostra through and through. Many probably expect a fluff article.  You won't get that from me.  The one thing I have noticed since the film has been gearing up for it's release June 15th, is people seemingly bemoaning the film saying it's a "film which tries to make Gotti look good, when he was a murderer."  To those that have said that, you haven't obviously seen the film, and yes let's be honest, John committed murder.  That's not the debate here.  I won't debate anyone on morality.  However there is one specific area, which as bottom dwelling as it is, that needs to be acknowledged because it seems to have escaped reality for many people.

When you mention John Gotti to people, often times, he's compared with Al Capone, or a movie star. In other circles people will say "he loved attention, brought this mess to his own home."  They will say "he talked too much."  They say "he killed a boss and broke the rules." There seems to be this subculture that attempts to hold the mafia to some "GODFATHER FILM CODE," which is irrelevant, false and laughable at best.  Too many people believe Hollywood and not Brooklyn or Queens.  The reality is, murdering a boss has been going on for centuries in different variations, and if your going to use fairy tales to exempt everyone else then John Gotti is exempt as well. The ends always justify the means in that life.

So what's true?  Yes, he probably said things he really shouldn't have.  That is on him.  He didn't however seek the media.  That's a distortion that Salvatore Gravano put on John's head.  The same can be said for Gravano and Gotti sitting in a car near the murder scene of Paul Castellano.  I don't believe that either.  Another Gravano fantasy.  John should have learned to duck more, but he didn't.  He faced it the way he faced everything else.  With a smirk and a fuck you.  That was just who Gotti was.  He had no choice.  What was he to do? Sit in home all day like some soccer mom?  So the idea that he chased them and loved them and enjoyed it is pretty false.

Masseria lays dead.
Maranzano lays dead.
He "killed a boss, and broke the rules."  This is the big one.  This is the one that FBI agents like to talk about.  This is the one half-assed rats bring up and FBI agents with a personal issue to vent about.  What nobody ever mentions is that Carlo Gambino helped kill Masseria, Maranzano, Colombo, and Anastasia.  All four of them.  Tommy Lucchese helped kill Masseria, Maranzano, Colombo and Anastasia.  Vito Genovese helped kill Masseria, Maranzano, Anastasia, Colombo, and tried to kill Frank Costello.  Lucky Luciano helped kill Masseria, Maranzano, and others.   Where exactly am I seeing that the mafia never did this prior to the hit on Castellano?  The fact it, this shit has happened from the beginning of time.  The media, the FBI has spun this so many times, like John Gotti all on his own decided "Fuck Paul," and without any help or permission he just went nuts and did what he wanted. Sorry to burst your bubble, but your all wrong.

John Gotti had a problem with Paul Castellano because Angelo Ruggiero was selling narcotics.  He got caught and the edict from Paulie was deal drugs and die.  The edict apparently went back to Carlo Gambino, which is sort of a  joke because Gambino was at the Havana Convention where drugs were discussed.  Paul felt drugs were bad news, but that didn't stop him from putting his cousin Rosario Gambino into New Jersey to control the coke and heroin trade.

What Angelo Ruggiero did was nothing different then what Paul was already doing, and half the mob.  The issue was Paul was afraid Angelo would get him arrested.  Paul had a big mouth of his own, and was caught talking mob business at his dinner table while trying to bang his Hispanic maid. Paul wanted tapes of the transcripts from the bugs on Angelo's line.

The stupid part is, Paul kept screaming at Neil Dellacroce to get those tapes.  He wanted John Gotti to act to.  He felt if Angelo was moving weight, John Gotti had to know, and therefore he would be in as much trouble as Angelo, and Gene Gotti.  What reporters don't often tell you, is that Paul Castellano already had copies of those transcripts of what Angelo said.  He knew Angelo bad mouthed people.  He knew exactly what Angelo had said and what it meant for him, which wasn't much, because Paul had other issues with the DeMeo Crew. Paul was going to prison for the rest of his fucking life and he knew it and was looking for someone to blame.  It wasn't Angelo Ruggiero or John or Gene Gotti, or even Neil Dellacroce that was responsible for Paul's problems.

The next part that gets distorted is why Paul asked for them tapes when he already knew what was on them.  It was an exercise in trust.  Paul wanted to see if he could trust Neil.  He wanted to see if John would kill Angelo.  Neil kept stalling and John kept telling Paul he had no idea, and didn't believe what people were saying.  It was designed to buy time.  But for what?  From who?

If you listen long enough FBI agents will tell you Paul was going to kill Gotti.  Not the case.  Paul didn't have time to kill Gotti.   However if Paul got off on the commission charges, which wasn't likely Paul could very well become an informant himself, or dispatch someone to clean house out of fear.  Gotti wasn't willing to play those odds, and I don't blame him.

Paul got killed for a lot of reasons.  I'm not here to justify murder.  I'm simply stating the facts versus what people are putting out that aren't accurate at all.  Paul was loathed.  He was a businessman and not a gangster.  He didn't shoot a gun once in his life.  Much of what he had was because of his relationship to Carlo Gambino.  Castellano preferred Purdue Chicken farms to Social Clubs.  He rubbed elbows with elitist businessmen.  That's not how a Godfather acts.  A godfather also doesn't tell his men that police are heroes.  It just sorta sets a bad vibe.

What pundits don't tell you is, Gotti put out feelers via Frankie Decicco about Castellano.  From what I know and people I have talked to, they all have told me, off the record everyone was behind it, including Vincent Gigante(who tried to kill Frank Costello  and missed.).  Nobody told John Gotti no.  Gaspipe Casso would later kill Decicco as he claimed that it was meant for Gotti, which is bullshit.  Casso had a beef with DeCicco which went back a long time.  It gave Casso the argument that it was an "eye for an eye," but the reality is, it was a personal beef.

John Gotti was the most recognizable guy on the streets.  He didn't hide.  You mean to tell me a remotely detonated bomb, and the guy who pushed it didn't recognized the difference between Gotti and DeCicco?  Why did they stop at one attempt if Gotti was on the hot seat?

They wouldn't have.  Gigante could have easily wiped Gotti off the map, and everyone knew that.  He didn't.  In fact, off the record, I heard shortly after Paul was killed Gotti and Gigante sat down and had coffee and discussed the garment district.  So the idea that everyone wanted him dead because he broke some rule is ridiculous.  John Gotti did what many others before him did. Maybe because in the fashion it was done, the brutality of it is what sat wrong with people. What about Abe Reles being tossed out a fucking window in Coney Island, or the St. Valentines Day Massacre?  Or the final shots of Carmine Galante, or Angelo Bruno?

Like him, love him, or loathe him, the one thing that people need to realize is, John Gotti was a gangster, the epitome of gangster.  You can wag your finger at the small nonsensical things all day.  You can wish and say and bark about things he should have done, or could have done.  The problem is, your not him, and you aren't reading facts but variations of facts and mis-truths about someone whose been vilified by the federal government for decades.  This is the same government who chased after his son for no other reason then he was his fathers son. 

A film is a film.  Don't allow the FBI the press and pundits thoughts(not even mine) sway your from seeing the film.  You should go see it.  If for nothing else, you're going to see a side of the Gotti family nobody has seen.  While John Gotti is a gangster to many, don't forget he was also a father, brother, uncle, grandfather, and friend to so many in New York.  To accept one man's sins, you must also accept his deeds.  John Gotti wasn't perfect.  John Gotti wasn't an angel.  John Gotti was, JOHN GOTTI. History can be distorted by those who have daggers in their eyes and venom on their lips. Never forget that. 

Thursday, June 7, 2018


Even I can't make this up.  John Parsons, of New Jersey who was arrested March 31, 2017 by The New Jersey State Police, for allegedly uploading two files, one of which being a picture and the other being a video.  The video contained an adult male raping a prepubescent girl, according the the New Jersey Attorney General's office.

Now how does this guy fit into Mob Talk Radio or even this blog?  Simple.  He calls John Alite a friend, and John Alite calls him a friend.  This isn't the first time John Alite has called a pedophile his friend.  Alite also called Michael Blutrich a cellie, and friend, was also a pedophile.  Not my words.  Try the words of multiple news outlets.  Blutrich also wrote the first draft of Alite's book.

Where this gets vile, is that John Alite on social media, before his removal from social media, called John Parsons a friend, and even shared on multiple posts old memories together.  Mike Jacobs attempted to distance John Alite's name by lying on social media(twitter) by saying that Alite met Parsons once 35 years ago.  However, the problem with that is two things. Either Alite made up the entire story of knowing Parsons in an effort to appear like he knew whom Parsons was pretending to be, and is now a deer caught in the headlights, or Alite did know Parsons.  It really doesn't matter at the end of the day because Alite posted a photo of himself and Parsons on a Facebook post, also mentioning Mike Jacobs. "Real friends and real stories with guys like John and Mike Jacobs is what youth need to know."  Umm, what?


Neither John Alite nor Jacobs has distanced themselves from John Parsons.  To make matters worse, now Parsons, since he's been outed is making all kinds of claims and is dropping  "alleged" mob names in Philadelphia.  This embecile loves the publicity too..  This transcription comes from a text he sent someone regarding the show I did regarding him.  Ask yourself this.  What kind of creature who is arrested for this sort of thing, likes the publicity?

"I'm watching them I thought special, right now dude I love the opening part name of the picture and me and Johnny(Alite) and ACDC that's fucking bad as hell bro, I love it. Publicity any publicity that's good publicity right there bro, my man!"

Either he didn't listen to the show at first, or he's more sick then I believed. I guess he sorta listened then exploded.

"Bro, he's ass is mine(referring to me) I'm going to sue the fuck out of him he cannot legally call me a pedophile was not convicted and he's implying people to kill me."

Well if you know all these big time people Ace, then what are you afraid of if you did nothing wrong?

For the record I didn't do either thing. I stated that "anyone arrested for or into child porn of any type should be killed.  Anyone who uploads it, watches it, or takes part in it in my opinion is a pedophile." Inferring isn't saying, and well, to be honest, he doesn't deny uploading porn, rather says something about being "set up."  He seems more concerned with people knowing what he did.  Then I guess he called Alite.  I guess they are friends.  However, Parsons apparently doesn't have any issues with pedophiles at all, because he makes a very telling statement regarding Blutrich whose a known pedophile.  So if Blutrich was the cheapest, that makes hiring a pedophile or asking a pedophile for help acceptable?

"You know what John says, John says this is all your fault. Listen bro you know what go to the lawyers tomorrow this mob talk radio guy, he's going to see some legal shit for me...."   Then he says this....

"Oh I love the intro though. Don't get me wrong, but he's telling people to fucking I should be dead and all this I haven't even been convicted you can't call people a pedophile you can't call somebody a bank robber if they've been convicted,(you can't? lol) he should know this is that, that ass is mine bro, you kidding me you know what the courts gonna eat him up and bro he don't have pockets like I do."

I guess he can get in line and sue CNN, FOX, and everyone else when they confer about an issue.  That's all I did.  But this sorta isn't the only thing this guy has done.  He got convicted of revenge porn against an ex.  Yeah, this isn't the first time he's dabbled in pornography.  You see, he actually attempted to blackmail and ex, saying he would send "nude photos, and videos," to her bosses.  He just didn't threaten it. He actually did it.  He sent porn photos to the Superintendent of Schools.  That little trick got him arrested and convicted.  Some transcripts from that here:

"Following an unsuccessful motion to dismiss the indictment against him, defendant John T. Parsons entered a plea of guilty to one count of invasion of privacy, N.J.S.A. 2C:14-9c. The judge sentenced defendant to a suspended sentence of eighteen months' imprisonment, together with mandated fines and penalties. Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion to dismiss.1 We affirm.
The underlying facts are not in significant dispute. Defendant and the victim, J.B., a school teacher, "met"2 through an online dating service. In September 2009, the parties' relationship consisted of phone conversations, text messages, as well as internet conversations. In addition, the parties exchanged photos of one another, including photos of themselves both clothed and unclothed. As to the photos, the parties understood that they were not to be sent or displayed to others.
The relationship was short-lived as, in November 2009, defendant ended the relationship with J.B. because defendant renewed a relationship with his former girlfriend. Apparently, J.B. reacted angrily and "told defendant off."

"Defendant reacted poorly and threatened to send the nude pictures of J.B. to her employer at the public school where she taught. Defendant followed up on his threat and forwarded the pictures to the school, notifying them that "you have an educator there that is . . . not proper."

Thereafter, J.B. informed the Atlantic County Prosecutor, who investigated the case. Defendant was identified as the sender of the photographs(John T. Parsons). The investigation included a phone call to defendant, who admitted sending the photographs to both the Superintendent of Schools and J.B.'s school. In the call, defendant also admitted that he and J.B. had exchanged the photographs with the understanding that they were not to be sent to anyone else. "The pictures were for his eyes only." In response to the investigating officer's inquiry as to whether J.B. gave permission to defendant to display the pictures to anyone else, J.B. responded in the negative."

He goes on to mention a very prolific names in the text too.  Apparently, and I won't mention his name here, but apparently he feels like this person is going to either come after me, or be mad.  What he doesn't realize is, I actually know this person and he is a close friend of mine.  I think this is more of an idle threat because he knows he's been outed.  This person he names wouldn't go near him, neither will The Latin Kings, Ms-13, or the mafia or whatever group he thinks he can use to threaten people.  Once they find out who he is, and what he was arrested for, if he knows them at all, won't touch him with a ten foot pole.

But this isn't the first idle threat of his.  He called Chris Kasparoza, pretending to be a tough Italian guy.  The problem is, in the voicemail he says, "an old Italian guy in Italy is mad about the issue between you and Johnny, and wants it resolved because you know bad things can happen."  He was pretending to be a mob guy trying to infer someone could get physically hurt. If he had any brain cells, he'd know, Alite is Albanian, not Italian.  Two, no Sicilian knows who Alite is, nor would they ever get involved in a public ASS THRASHING that Alite is getting, because frankly he's a goddamned rat.   He eventually admitted to making the call and tried to blame it on Mike Jacobs, another Alite fanboy.

What makes this all the more hilarious, is that Jacobs obviously gave out Chris's telephone number through John Alite.  Nobody else would have it.  So therefore this once again ties all the way back to John Alite. Epic Fail!

The mere suggestion that John Alite thinks taking John Parsons to a school to tell stories to children especially considering Parsons recent arrest, one has to wonder what fucking planet any of them are on.  You don't have to be convicted to be a pedophile to be considered one after you upload a child being raped by an adult.  Parsons also has a history of making "terrorist threats of violence."  He's been arrested for that too.

I said this on my show, this is not all about Alite or his groupies.  This is very much an animal that needs to be kept away from children at all cost.  You don't accidentally upload child porn.  You don't accidentally get caught with 70 some other mentally deranged scumbags.  You very much get arrested for this sort of thing because you uploaded it.  Uploading it, is the same as watching it.  Uploading it the same as going out and doing it.

I never made any suggestion people should run out and kill anyone.  I simply said in my opinion child touchers, people that watch that shit, should be killed.  There is no treatment or hell good enough for them.  Parson's issue is, I let people know.  I let people know because I don't want a single kid, or a single school, or a single parent having their child near this guy.  If he once came out and said I didn't do that, then maybe I would let the courts handle it.  The truth is, he loved the publicity.  How fucking deranged and unhinged do you have to be to think that "publicity is cool," when someone is calling you what you are?  How is it "bad ass," when someone tells everyone you got busted by the state police for uploading a video of a child being raped?

To further my point, I could go more in depth, but I have a feeling others will.  I'm covering what I covered the other day.  He has a long record with some very interesting and disturbing charges.  To make it all the more egregious, John Alite, who allegedly speaks for children tried blaming this entire thing on Chris Kasparoza, which is laughable.  How about no John, the guy your friends with is fucking vile.  Further proving, Alite doesn't seem to mind the issue, unless he doesn't know how to tell the guy he's vile and to shove off.  He didn't tell Blutrich that so I cannot imagine he will now.  All Alite does is blame people who aren't even involved in this.  I wrote this, I did the radio, nobody else.

If John Alite was going to support kids, and being a relevant spokesmen in church, schools, then he sure as hell shouldn't be calling a guy like Parsons his "friend."  That's what people need to take notice of.  If that's the stance he will take, along with his own actions, none of them should be allowed near a school now, or in the future and I will stop at nothing by crashing these events letting the schools know just who they are allowing in to speak to kids.  You cannot have someone like that who calls people who upload child porn videos friends, and you certainly cannot under any circumstances say that "this is the stories the youth need to hear."  Bullshit.  The parents are the ones who need to hear who you are and who and what you associate with.   Didn't Alite also say a priest molested him?  If that's true, which it isn't, why let a guy like Parsons near him or anyone else for that matter?  See it just doesn't add up.  Well, perhaps it does.  Shit always floats upward.

Parsons can try and sue me.  He can claim that mobsters from Philadelphia are going to come to my home and hurt me.  The truth is, I would guarantee they aren't, and I guarantee that you won't be on anyone's Christmas card list ever again.  Word to the wise, you should be very careful throwing names around you don't know, and trying to put them on texts messages coming from a despicable piece of shit like yourself.

Hate me, like me, it doesn't matter, but what I won't allow is the pond scum of society to go near innocent kids, nor will I let they try to fake that they are trying to make a difference when they befriend something as disgusting as Parsons.  I would encourage all of you who live in New Jersey (Vineland) to make sure this guys face gets plastered everywhere so he can't go near any of your kids, or schools.  Some may think I'm wrong, but if it saves one parent, one kid, from ever having to go through any situation with that guy, then I did something good.  It's the right thing to do.

Monday, May 14, 2018


Sports Gambling has always had a seedy past.  It not only has bankrupted people, but it's also made people insanely wealthy, especially the mafia.  It's always been one of the major money making markets the mob has employed for a long long time.  Now, with the Supreme Court on Monday in a 6-3 vote, allowing states to decide if they want to legally allow sports betting.

The vote strikes down a 1992 federal law that has prohibited most states from authorizing sports betting.  New Jersey especially wanted to change the law.  The court said that "the federal law violated constitutional principles limiting the federal government from controlling state policy, unconstitutionally forcing states to prohibit sports betting under their own laws."  The decision basically allows the states to decide their own fate. 

For a long time Nevada had a monopoly on sports betting, but it appears now that many other states who want to capitalize on revenue and money can jump right in the deep end with the rest.  Where this gets iffy is whether congress will jump in and make a declaration and allow states to make the decision on their own, or if they will ena
ct federal regulations on sports betting.   It's my opinion if they enact regulations, believe me the mob will move in, so from a street perspective that's great news, but if left up to the states to decide, then it could cripple the seedy back room deals for betting.

If anything this is a win win for organized crime. If anyone thinks, on a basic level that this deal kills organized crimes involvement into the sports book industry your completely wrong.  If anything this almost makes it easier in a million different ways.  The MLB, NHL, NFL, and other sports leagues oppose this idea because they are afraid the integrity of the the game will be in dire straits.  The NHL moved a team to Vegas, so I really don't want to hear shit they have to say on the matter when you consider tickets for NHL games are outrageous.    For the MLB to worry about it's integrity, let me point to you all the GHB and cheating that's gone on there for decades.  What they really fear isn't games being rigged, but it's losing money.  None of these leagues want to lose money.  That's the real argument here, not some morality questions.

From a criminal perspective, and I won't go into the deep end with details because I'm not going to teach some internet goofball how to run book, but there are ways to get around everything.  From odds, to different style bets, believe me there are a million ways to get around any ruling by the states or the government.  What will be interesting is to how this ruling effects criminal charges.  If the government allows it, and the states allow it, I can see a huge argument coming about someone who gets pinched for bookmaking. The mob has used bookmaking to make millions, and if you think companies like Bovada, Oddshark, Bettfair, are going to keep monopolizing the market you'd be wrong.  If this stays the course, mob guys can simply open their own book shop online, but the problem is, mob guys don't want to pay taxes.  I'm a firm believer in where there is a will there is a way, and sure one can make a half assed argument about this ruling crippling back room bookies, but it doesn't.  In fact, I think it will have the complete opposite effect.  

In comparison, look at how the legality of Marijuana in Colorado and California has changed the climate.  Both states made huge money, forgetaboutit type of money. The state gets a kickback, has a huge surplus of cash, criminal arrests for marijuana have gone down in droves, so it's a win win. It allowed small companies to become millionaires overnight.  Same thing here. That's if you want to pay taxes. Just as we mention marijuana, I mention bookmaking.  Just because it's been made legal doesn't mean marijuana isn't still coming over the border.  It is, perhaps even more than before.  Many of these shops get marijuana not from farmers, but from well, NARCO distributors, which in some cases deflated and inflated prices.  In some cases it's advantageous to go to a distributor
over the farmer because the prices are lower which means more profit, and in the long run distributors sell more product.  It's commerce no matter how you look at it.  So if you think the state legalizing it, is going to change the end game for the mob and other criminal groups you'd be wrong.

Thursday, April 19, 2018


Nosferatu Gravano
I was wondering when this would happen.  Salvatore "lizard man," Gravano recently spoke to mob writer Jerry Capeci in regards to several things.  He discussed his feelings on Trump, and that the government needs "a fucking gangster," as a President and maybe these problems with North Korea would go away.

 Gee, thanks Sammy.  We will keep that in mind the next election if they are looking for a bottom dwelling scum bag drug dealer like yourself.  He also took a shot at Witsec Mafia and John Gotti Jr.

Where to begin.  First, Jerry Capeci likes starting trouble. Second, Salvatore Gravano whether you like him or loathe him really isn't relevant anymore.  He was back in 1980. Unless your willing to toss on a members only jacket, die your hair pink, and hang out on the lower east side listening to the Stray Cats and new wave punk, seriously, anything he says just isn't relevant anymore.

The one curious factor I do have is why he even opined about Witsec.  Apparently he is curmudgeoned about his name being "all over it."  Well, to be truthful, um, you did sorta lie to the government, you did sort break your agreement with them, um, you sorta told the world you were a changed man and were going to just live your life in peace, but then you sorta got caught selling drugs to kids with a bunch of white supremacists.  Not only that, but you dragged your wife, and children into the mix.  Not only embarrassing the FBI(which was fantastic) but truly showing who you are at your core.  But him being a rat, that's just one thing I hate about him.

The biggest thing I hate about him?  He killed an innocent 17 year old boy named Alan Kaiser.  You won't often hear anyone mention that.  Diane Sawyer didn't either know of have the courage to ask it.  He did kill his best friend Louis Milito too.  Whacked em', and stole his business.  In fact it was with Milito when they drove up on Alan Kaiser walking home, coaxed him near the car and shotgunned him to death.  Why?  Mistaken Identity. Where was the government on that one?  In most cases in New York if you kill anyone you're getting a life sentence, let alone killing a child.

However "Lizard Man," because these days he looks like one, or perhaps a shriveled up peach, admitted to 19 murders, but never had to face the reality of killing a child. Karen Gravano, who has been seen on Mob Wives, discusses her father consistently, lovingly.  Never has mentioned all the horrid shit her father did, and how many lives and parents were destroyed by his actions.  She never mentions the Kaiser family, or Joi Faraci in her musings.  Instead with get this "Italian Stereotyped, Do You Know Who My Father Is," bullshit.

If Sammy "Prune Face," truly wants to open his mouth, maybe he ought to apologize to Joi and her family for KILLING A CHILD.  He ought to try and salvage what's left of his miserable immoral life and speak about something other than film projects.  Once a gangster now allegedly reduced to selling photos of his own mugshot for money.  It's revolting.  Everything about him is revolting.

I don't care who Sammy was, or who he still thinks he is.  The bottom line is, these rats all do the same thing.  They pretend that life is different, they talk tough, but the reality is, bottom line, is that they are weak.  Weak men talk.  It's the truth.  Talk is cheap.  Always has been.

As for Capeci, it's another attempt at stoking the fire between Alite and Gotti, and a chance to get readers to read his dribble.  He needed to get a headline and he got it, kudos there, but it's revolting that you'd even interview a pile of garbage about anything, and not ask him why he killed a kid.  It's just another sign that people care more about ratings and views and clicks then the harsh reality of life.

As for his comments about John Gotti Jr and the Witsec Project, he's saying all this from an undisclosed location in Arizona.  He's saying this because he has nothing better to do. Maybe he's like Johnny "Best Seller" Alite and loves that his name is being mentioned again.  Maybe for Sammy he just wants to be left alone, but it sure doesn't seem like it considering Alite has been boasting how him and Sammy "Are doing projects together, and are friends."  In either case, Sammy should go back into his cave and just continue being the vampire he is.